IS THE "RUSSIA ISSUE" SUBJECT TO CHANGE? – AT 11:11:20 A.M. ET:   Have you noticed that the word "collusion" seems to be fading away?  From the Washington Examiner: 

Have you noticed? In recent public comments, the lawmakers investigating the Trump-Russia affair, along with some of the commentators who dissect its every development, seem to be focusing more on the facts of Russia's attempts to interfere with the 2016 election and less on allegations that Donald Trump or his associates colluded with those efforts.

Some of that could be just an impression. But the fact is, the subjects that have dominated discussion of the Trump-Russia matter lately -- Facebook and other social media ads and the most recent update from Senate Intelligence Committee leaders Richard Burr and Mark Warner -- do not necessarily point toward collusion. Rather, more often than not, the latest talk points toward Russian "active measures," that is, the effort to disrupt the 2016 campaign.

Why the change?

"Because that's where the evidence is going," one lawmaker who follows the matter closely told me in a text exchange. "I mean, things could always change, but that observation is just the reality of the situation right now, as I see it."

"Because they've been spinning their wheels on something for which evidence has yet to emerge," said another lawmaker.

COMMENT:  Raises serious questions about how the mainstream media has handled this issue.  The media had Trump guilty before a single hearing was held or a single witness sworn.

Donald Trump may be his own worst enemy – he is – but the media can be its worst enemy as well.  If the press cannot be believed, the bad guys in government and industry get a pass.

October 23, 2017